An Evaluation of UM-Tool/2

PROS:

• good modularity of the architecture, where a single module deals with the belief revision problem;

• the selection of the most plausible model is explicit, under the control of the developer;

• the knowledge utilized is more declarative, not intermixed with procedural knowledge about consistency restoration;

• the old de-istanciation procedures are fully avoided;

• it is much easier to develop the stereotype knowledge base;

• the ATMS is perfectly general;

CONS & CRITICAL:

• ATMS mechanism may be very demanding;

• selecting the most plausible model is not at all trivial;

• not extensively validated.

Diapositiva precedente

Torna alla prima diapositiva

Visualizza versione grafica